Hello, this is Daily Stock.
[Image: /stdaily/uploads/202609/gen_6aa2fe5fe124d1.91695968.png]
Executive Summary
Intel (INTC) is going all out to secure external foundry customers ahead of the commercialization of its 1.8nm-class 18A process.
The company is attempting a technological leap by simultaneously adopting RibbonFET transistors and PowerVia backside power delivery network technology.
While collaborations with certain Big Tech players such as Microsoft and Amazon have been confirmed, whether these will translate into large-scale volume production orders remains the market's key verification hurdle.
Yield stability and commercial reliability serve as the pivotal watershed that will dictate a valuation re-rating for Intel's stock.
As of intraday trading on September 11, 2026 (provisional), global equity markets are exhibiting a distinct fundamental decoupling among the United States, Europe, and Asia.
According to proprietary metrics, the Nasdaq Fear & Greed Index stands at Fear (36.3), while the KOSPI sits at Neutral (50.7), highlighting deepening wait-and-see sentiment toward advanced tech equities.
Current Situation Overview
Intel Foundry Services (IFS) recently announced that it has processed a cumulative total of over 1 million wafers utilizing ASML's next-generation High-NA EUV lithography equipment.
It is ramping up technical maturity by entering the risk production phase for its advanced 18A process and the performance-enhanced 18A-P version.
Its external order pipeline features names such as Microsoft, Amazon's cloud unit, and Broadcom.
While potential collaboration talks with NVIDIA continue to be discussed, official disclosures regarding finalized, large-scale mass production contracts remain limited.
Intel's intraday share price remains unconfirmed (based on the latest verified figures), but the stock continues to exhibit elevated volatility alongside technology validation headlines.
Market participants are closely watching the mass production results of Intel's in-house next-generation chip, Panther Lake, as well as external tape-out progress.
As of intraday trading on September 11, 2026 (provisional), the USD/KRW exchange rate is trading at 1,347.60 won per dollar.
The KOSPI stands at 7,033.92, while the KOSDAQ trades at 836.92, reflecting mixed, range-bound price action.
In terms of index momentum, the Daily Stock Fear & Greed Index shows the KOSPI currently at Neutral (50.7), recovering from Fear (32.5) one week ago.
Conversely, the Nasdaq Fear & Greed Index stands at Fear (36.3), slowing sharply compared to Neutral (43.9) one week ago and Greed (64.7) one month ago, reflecting heightened caution over volatility.
Financial Analysis
Intel's earnings recovery depends on how effectively its core PC and server CPU businesses can defend against the astronomical capital expenditures (CapEx) required by its foundry division.
The foundry unit faces inevitable operating losses over a prolonged horizon due to upfront facility investments and yield stabilization costs.
In commodity markets, copper prices—directly linked to semiconductor fab construction and advanced interconnects—alongside oil price volatility, which dictates fab power generation costs, continue to exert margin pressure on manufacturing expenses.
Even as global liquidity enters an interest rate-cutting cycle, capital is flowing selectively into tangible capital expenditures, elevating the importance of capital allocation efficiency.
The table below provides a fundamental comparison of macroeconomic indicators and semiconductor supply chains across major regions as of intraday trading on September 11, 2026 (provisional).
| Region | Benchmark Relative Strength | Major Central Bank Monetary Policy | Manufacturing PMI Stance | Core Semiconductor Value Chain Role |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| **United States** | Broad strength alongside widening volatility | Rising odds of a gradual Fed easing scenario | Mixed fluctuations around the 50-mark | Fabless design dominance and foundry reshoring |
| **Europe** | Recession-defensive stagnation | ECB in an additional rate-cut cycle | Persistent contraction in the upper 40s | Proprietary monopoly over key equipment (ASML) & materials |
| **Asia** | Bifurcation driven by FX & policy divergence | BOJ further hike stance vs. PBOC easing | Korea/Taiwan expansion; China stagnation | High-volume manufacturing hub (Taiwan's TSMC, Korea's Samsung) |
[Image: /stdaily/uploads/202609/gen_6aa2fe6abe7788.63924324.png]
Valuation
Intel's valuation multiple continues to trade at a substantial discount compared to TSMC, which commands a near-monopolistic position, and NVIDIA, which generates high margins from proprietary designs.
This discount reflects the fact that IFS has yet to substantiate a sufficient external customer order backlog in hard financial figures following its internal separation.
If large-scale exclusive chip production contracts from leading Big Tech firms are finalized on the 18A node, the foundry business could be valued separately, potentially unlocking a powerful re-rating across P/B and EV/EBITDA multiples.
Conversely, if customer acquisition falls short, 18A risks becoming a high-cost node serving predominantly internal captive volume, which would impair return on equity (ROE).
European semiconductor equipment stocks maintain elevated P/E multiples backed by resilient pricing power and moat advantages.
Meanwhile, Asian foundry competitors face widening valuation dispersion depending on the pace of their transitions to high-volume 2nm production.
Expert and Institutional Perspectives
Global semiconductor research institutions broadly agree that Intel achieved symbolic technological leadership through its early adoption of High-NA EUV.
However, analysts emphasize that research and development wafer runs differ drastically from commercial mass-production yields.
Wall Street investment banks view tape-out results for custom chips by key 18A customer Microsoft, alongside its production ramp timeline entering 2026–2027, as the ultimate litmus test.
Market consensus indicates that Intel's ability to abandon legacy IDM practices and build a truly client-centric foundry ecosystem—including robust Process Design Kit (PDK) support—will decide whether it wins sustained orders.
Meanwhile, major asset managers across Asia and Europe are carefully monitoring the time lag between the disbursement pace of US CHIPS and Science Act subsidies and Intel's actual fab completion schedules.
Risk Factors
The most critical internal risk is a delay in 18A yield stabilization and higher-than-expected unit production costs.
If wafer-to-wafer variance is not fully managed, it could spur client defection and heighten the transition burden toward the next-generation 14A process.
Geopolitical developments also present a double-edged sword.
While operating domestic US manufacturing hubs offers national security advantages, heightened export controls targeting China threaten legacy chip sales alongside potential disruptions to critical noble gases and raw material supply lines.
From a macroeconomic perspective, preemptive rate cuts by the ECB alongside tightening efforts by the BOJ could trigger sharp foreign exchange volatility across global currency markets.
With the Nasdaq Fear & Greed Index cooling sharply to 36.3, rising financing costs across the broader tech sector represent an additional underlying headwind.
Investment Outlook Summary
Investing in Intel must be framed around an event-driven thesis: technological milestones on the 18A process converting into binding, high-volume external production contracts.
A conservative stance is warranted to separate marketing and technical announcements from binding volume manufacturing disclosures.
Over the short term, in-house production quality and performance benchmarks for its next-generation architecture chip, Panther Lake, are likely to serve as the primary share price support.
Over the medium to long term, an incremental accumulation strategy remains sensible until tangible order sizes from major third-party fabless customers are visibly confirmed.
Amid the ongoing tri-polar global decoupling backdrop, portfolio managers should emphasize diversification across US tech infrastructure, European monopoly equipment providers, and Asian foundry manufacturing value chains.
Investor Checkpoint Q&A
Q1: Why is Intel's 18A process technologically significant?
A1: Intel 18A is the world's first leading-edge node to simultaneously introduce RibbonFET (Gate-All-Around architecture) and PowerVia (backside power delivery network).
This combination is designed to deliver step-function improvements in chip power efficiency and transistor density.
Q2: Who are the major external customers linked to Intel Foundry so far?
A2: Microsoft has officially announced its intention to use the 18A process for custom in-house silicon, while Amazon AWS and Broadcom have established collaborative engagements.
Talks with mega-cap customers such as NVIDIA and Apple continue to be reported, though confirmed volume production contracts await formal disclosure.
Q3: What is the significance of processing 1 million wafers on High-NA EUV with ASML?
A3: The milestone demonstrates that Intel's early adoption of next-generation High-NA EUV lithography has progressed beyond pure lab experimentation into systematic line testing and stabilization.
It indicates that Intel is accumulating operational experience with next-generation tools ahead of competitors such as TSMC and Samsung Electronics.
Q4: Why do prospective clients remain cautious about signing foundry contracts with Intel?
A4: Hesitation stems from memories of Intel's past historical delays in leading-edge process rollouts, alongside concerns over the maturity of its foundry ecosystem (such as PDKs and advanced packaging libraries).
Customers are reluctant to commit critical, flagship silicon without fully validated mass-production yield tracks.
Q5: How does the US-EU-Asia tri-polar decoupling affect Intel from a macro perspective?
A5: US reshoring policies and federal incentives provide structural tailwinds for Intel's domestic expansion.
However, slowing European growth, Asian currency volatility, and prevailing fear in the Nasdaq market could weigh on broad tech valuations, underscoring the need for continuous cross-regional macro monitoring.