Hello, this is Daily Stock, delivering swift and accurate insights by precisely analyzing core indicators of the global financial market.
[Image: /stdaily/uploads/202608/gen_6a6cf103c7a8e8.00882399.png]
Executive Summary
- The MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Index is emerging as a new core pillar of global asset allocation, demonstrating a clear relative strength advantage over the Developed Markets (DM) Index.
- Earnings improvements at Asian tech companies—the core hub of the AI semiconductor supply chain—and an attractive Forward Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of around 11x are analyzed as key drivers attracting capital inflows.
- Amid the tri-polar decoupling among the US, Europe, and Asia, the global rate-cut cycle and the long-term weakness of the US dollar are acting as turning points that further highlight the relative value of EM assets.
Current Situation Summary
- As of August 1, 2026, the global stock markets are further deepening their fundamental decoupling across major regions, including the US, Europe, and Asia.
- Currently, the KOSPI is at 6,595.45, the KOSDAQ is at 719.76, and the Nasdaq closed at 25,340.78. The USD/KRW exchange rate stands at 1,438.30 KRW, with exchange rate volatility acting as a major variable for domestic market supply and demand.
- According to Daily Stock's proprietary Fear & Greed Index, the KOSPI is currently in the Fear stage (23.7), compared to Extreme Fear (13.5) a week ago, Fear (23.4) a month ago, and Greed (66.5) three months ago, suggesting a gradual attempt to rebound from an extreme slump.
- The Nasdaq's Fear & Greed Index is currently at Fear (39), compared to Neutral (41.3) a week ago, Fear (30) a month ago, and Greed (63.7) three months ago.
- Against this macroeconomic backdrop, the MSCI EM Index recorded a total return of 33.57% during 2025, outperforming the MSCI World (DM) Index's 21.09%, and is continuing its robust relative strength compared to developed markets in 2026.
Financial Analysis
- According to the latest index factsheet published on June 30, 2026, the MSCI EM Index consists of 1,178 large- and mid-cap stocks across 24 countries, reflecting approximately 85% of the free-float market capitalization in each country.
- A precise comparison of financial metrics against DM and global indexes clearly reveals the relative investment attractiveness of the EM Index.
| Index Category | Dividend Yield | Price-to-Earnings (P/E) | Forward P/E | Price-to-Book (P/BV) | 1 Yr Total Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| **MSCI Emerging Markets** | 1.93% | 18.61x | 11.65x | 2.58x | 43.51% |
| **MSCI World (Developed)** | 1.52% | 24.57x | 19.17x | 4.15x | 21.34% |
| **MSCI ACWI (All Country)** | 1.57% | 23.64x | 17.78x | 3.86x | 23.67% |
- The Forward P/E of the MSCI EM Index stands at 11.65x, which is significantly undervalued compared to the Developed Markets Index (19.17x).
- Furthermore, its 1-year total return reached 43.51%, demonstrating overwhelming relative strength by more than doubling that of the Developed Markets Index (21.34%).
[Image: /stdaily/uploads/202608/gen_6a6cf10c696a20.51091349.png]
Valuation
- The MSCI EM to MSCI World Ratio, a gauge for global liquidity allocation, appears to have broken out of its long-running DM-dominated regime and entered a multi-year cyclical rebound.
- This narrowing valuation gap, coupled with skepticism over "US exceptionalism," is seen as a key factor accelerating demand for global portfolio diversification.
- As the US Dollar Index enters a downward stabilization phase due to the Federal Reserve's monetary easing stance and concerns over US fiscal deficits, a scenario of stronger EM currencies against the USD is driving EM asset valuations.
- In the commodities market, the prices of raw materials and intermediate goods essential for the green energy transition and AI datacenter infrastructure buildouts remain in a long-term upcycle, supporting the profit margins of EM exporters.
Expert & Institutional Analysis
- Franklin Templeton recently analyzed that emerging markets have evolved beyond mere high-growth, low-valuation plays into vital high-value-added manufacturing bases for the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
- Indeed, while Old Economy industries like energy and materials accounted for a third of the EM Index 15 years ago, New Economy sectors such as technology, communications, and consumer discretionary now make up 64% of the index.
- This indicates that the structural earnings growth of Asian tech giants, like Taiwan and South Korea—functioning as the ultimate manufacturing partners for the global semiconductor and datacenter sectors—has transformed the index's fundamental strength.
- In addition, Yardeni Research assessed that while developed economies face rapid aging and productivity limits, emerging markets are highly likely to maintain long-term domestic consumption growth momentum, backed by favorable young demographics and a robust influx into the middle class.
Risk Factors
- However, supply chain disruptions and geopolitical frictions that threaten the relative strength run of the EM Index must not be overlooked.
- Whenever military friction arises in key energy transport routes like the Strait of Hormuz, currency depreciation and import price pressures could intensify for energy-dependent emerging economies, temporarily dampening investor sentiment.
- Moreover, amid a trend of rising global trade tariffs, export-oriented EM manufacturers may have to bear the burden of cost pass-throughs.
- In the MSCI Annual Market Classification Review announced in June 2026, the South Korean stock market once again failed to be added to the watch list for developed market status. Consequently, institutional caution stemming from institutional volatility remains a key challenge for the Korean capital market to overcome.
Investment Perspective Summary
- In conclusion, the improvement in the relative strength of the MSCI EM Index may signal a structural cycle shift rather than a simple technical rebound from a global diversification perspective.
- Global institutions fatigued by growth centered on US Big Tech are shifting and reallocating portfolios to emerging markets in search of an attractive forward P/E of around 11x and solid earnings momentum.
- However, this is a juncture that calls for a selective approach (selectivity), combining tactical execution based on each country's currency exposure, trade governance, and raw material import share.
[Image: /stdaily/uploads/202608/gen_6a6cf11768b3e2.87429697.png]
Investor Checklist Q&A
1. What does it mean when the relative strength of the MSCI EM Index rises?
- It means that the investment returns of emerging market equities (MSCI EM) are outperforming or showing strength relative to developed market equities (MSCI World). It serves as a gauge indicating that global capital is net-flowing from developed markets to alternative emerging markets.
2. What is the valuation advantage of the current EM Index?
- As of mid-2026, the Forward P/E of the MSCI EM Index is approximately 11.65x, which is deeply discounted compared to the 19.17x of the Developed Markets Index, providing highly attractive price metrics for value-oriented capital.
3. How does the failure of the South Korean stock market to enter the Developed Markets watch list in 2026 affect the EM Index?
- While it alleviated concerns over immediate large-scale outflows of global passive funds, it also allowed South Korea to maintain its significant weight within the index as a leading EM nation alongside Taiwan and China.
4. What are the macroeconomic drivers boosting the growth of the EM Index?
- The main drivers are the US Federal Reserve's monetary easing stance leading to the downward stabilization of the US dollar, alongside a solid recovery in global demand for advanced tech products and high-value-added manufactured components.
5. What are the key risk factors to watch out for when investing?
- Investors should closely monitor the risk of shrinking export margins due to rising global protectionism, energy supply shocks from geopolitical instability in commodity transit routes like the Strait of Hormuz, and potential hawkish shifts in developed markets' monetary policies.
Sources
Was this report helpful?
More in this category